Blenderized Tube Feeding in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic review | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Critical Comments in Biomedicine | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Volume 2, Issue 2 - Serial Number 4, September 2021 PDF (2.48 M) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Document Type: Article | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| DOI: https://doi.org/10.18502/ccb.v2i2.7396 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Authors | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Behnam Bahramian1; Saeedeh Talebi1; Mitra Rezaie* 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1Department of Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2Department of Nutrition, Faculty of medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Background: Enteral feeding (EF) is the delivery of liquid nutritional support through a tube for hospitalized patients with gastrointestinal dysfunction who are incapable of eating or unable to meet their nutritional requirements via the oral route. Hospitals reports indicate increase interest and demand for blenderized tube feeding (BTF) as an alternative to commercial enteral formulas particularly in families of tube fed children. In particular, by increasing food sensitivity and more complex identification in children, BTF allows families to adjust their diet to their children's needs. This systematic review study aimed to investigate BTF in pediatric patients. Methods: Literature search was conducted in four English databases, including Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar, using multiple keywords, such as blenderized tube feeding, pediatric, blended formula, homemade enteral nutrition, and children. Out of 103 retrieved articles, 6 were selected and reviewed. Results: The six articles that included the study criteria were reviewed. The results showed that calories were approximately 1kcal/g, protein 13 -22%, fat 30 - 34%, and carbohydrates 45-55%. Conclusions: The results indicated that BTF of calories, fat, carbohydrates, and protein is acceptable and can be administered to the pediatric, but due to concerns about calorie deficiency and macronutrients should be under the supervision of a nutritionist. BTFs are a good choice among children; since they can improve gastrointestinal symptoms and are a good option for families who use EF for their children at home. Most pediatric patients use BTFs as a portion of their EF, making it necessary that nutritionists and physicians expand their knowledge related to BTFs to appropriately care for these pediatric patients. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Keywords | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Blenderized Tube Feeding; Pediatric; Patients; Children; Systematic Review | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Full Text | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Introduction It has been proven that children need high protein and energy intake to grow, and malnutrition in childhood can affect their health for the rest of their life [1]. Malnutrition is related to increased length of hospital stay, disease and mortality, infection, and increased hospital costs in children [2-4]. Studies have shown that the prevalence of pediatric malnutrition is about 24.1% in Germany, 18.7% in Brazil, 11% in France, 9.9% in New Zealand, 8.2% in Spain, and 31.8% in Turkey [5-11]. Enteral feeding (EF) is the preferred route of nutritional supplementation which is necessary for the management of patients who are unable to ingest food orally [12]. Although commercial formulas have been available for over 30 years, they have high osmolality and do not taste good. Several properties of commercial formulas that are rich in carbohydrates, high in saturated fat, and devoid of fiber, fruits, and vegetables are heavily involved in the pathogenesis of the cardiovascular disease and pulmonary diseases. The preservatives in these formulas may also be associated with inflammatory diseases [13-15]. Children with swallowing problems, neurological disorders, and etc. often need enteral nutrition using primarily commercial formulas; however, BTFs have become more popular for pediatrics and have come out as part of home enteral feeding in recent years [16-19] because BTFs are more natural, healthier, and better tolerated than the commercial formula [19, 20]. Studies also have shown a positive clinical outcome for using BTFs in children [13, 21]. A study conducted in 2015 reported that 57% of nutritionists use and recommend BTFs for pediatric populations [18]. Concerns about contamination, infection, and nutrient content of BTFs should be thoroughly trained by a nutritionist to minimize their hazards [22]. Advantages of BTFs include using organic foods or genetically modified organism free foods, preventing food allergies, reducing feeding intolerance, such as reduced gagging and retching, improving intestinal function, increasing dietary diversity, as well as reducing oral aversion, chronic diarrhea, and costs [14, 20, 21, 23, 24]. In particular, BTFs allow children's families to tailor a diet to their pediatric needs [14]. Given that, the use of BTFs in children has increased in recent years and no review study has been conducted in this regard. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effect of blenderized tube feeding in pediatric patients. Materials and Method Information sources The articles conducted on the blenderized tube feeding in pediatric patients were reviewed from 2010 to 2020, to find the recent investigations. Four databases were used: Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar. The references of included articles were also checked for related studies. The search strategy used for the systematic search was: ("blenderized tube feeding" OR "blended formula" OR "homemade enteral nutrition") AND (" pediatric" OR "Children"). Selection criteria and quality assessment Two reviewers independently screened the databases and reviewed the titles, abstracts, and full texts to determine the articles which met the inclusion criteria and any discrepancies were resolved by consensus. Studies which investigated the effect of blenderized tube feeding formulation in pediatric patients and provided data on their calories and macronutrients were included. The exclusion criteria included failure to report the used formulation, and failure to report calories, fat, protein, and carbohydrates content of BTFs. Data extraction The details extracted for each of the studies included the first author’s last name, the time of conducting the study, publication date, and blenderized tube feeding in pediatric patients. Results Figure 1 depicts the selection process of the studies within the PRISMA diagram. In the systematic literature search, 103 articles were obtained from Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct, Google Scholar as well as the relevant studies identified in cross-references. After the elimination of duplicates, 79 articles were considered eligible for title/abstract screening, 24 of which were retrieved for full-text assessment. Finally, 6 eligible studies were selected for the systematic review. The results showed that the calories of BTFs were about 1 1kcal/g, protein 13%-22%, fat 30%-34%, and carbohydrates 45%-55% (Table 1). The carbohydrates in BTF are easily obtained from fruits, starchy vegetables, whole grains, and carbohydrate-based calorie additives. Protein is also provided through cow milk or milk powder and meat. Vegetable oil, olive oil, and etc. have also been used to satisfy fat intake. The blenderized tube feedings also contained fiber and phytochemicals. Phytochemicals are an extensive category of plant compounds that have been shown to have significant health benefits from fruits, vegetables, beans, cereals, and plant-based beverages.
Figure 1. Flow diagram showing the results of the searches
Table 1. Blenderized tube feeding in pediatric patients
Discussion The most common diseases in children that require enteral feeding include congenital abnormalities (42%), perinatal problems (38%), and neurologic diseases (16%)[28]. Tables 2 reveal the criteria for selecting the appropriate patients for BTF [29]. Although children also use commercial formulas, due to the benefits of BTFs, health professionals and patients' families have become more interested in using BTFs. However, studies have shown that the risk of microbial contamination can lead to insufficient energy and nutrient content. This is due the fact that BTFs prepared in hospitals do not have a specific formula and are prepared by mixing different foods, such as milk, meat, juice, vegetables, etc. in completely different amounts. Therefore, the amount of energy, carbohydrates, proteins, and fats of these solutions are different [30-32]. After the preparation of BTFs, they should be stored within the temperature range of 2-8°C. Personnel should wash, dry, and disinfect hands frequently and use masks before preparing BTFs for non-sterile, blended, diluted, or decanted foods. Notably, the administration time should not exceed four hours [29, 33]. During the handling process, foods should not be exposed to temperatures of 10-60°C for more than 30 minutes, and the storage time should be less than 12 hours [34]. Parents and hospitals could follow the guidelines provided by Table 2. Indications and contradictions for candidating children for BTF
Designing the diet Energy Energy needs vary considerably between people depending on the patient's age, activity, and health status, but infants and children require more energy than adults (Table 3) [36]. As a starting point in nutrition, nutritionists may want to consider consuming 10% more energy than the amount a child currently consumes [37]. Tools for the starting point to create a diet plan based on calorie goals are presented in Table 4. Examples of food sources for BTFs can be found in Table 5. Nutrients can be categorized into carbohydrates, proteins, and fats that provide calories, and vitamins, and minerals. The energy in foodstuffs is released via the oxidation of carbohydrates, fats, and proteins in the body, and the chemical energy needed to maintain metabolism and other body functions is produced [38]. Lack of macronutrients can be categorized Table 3. Average energy requirements for the different age groups
Table 4. Tools for the starting point to create a diet plan based on calorie goals
Table 5. Examples of food sources for BTFs
Protein The first step is to select the right source of protein; since plant proteins are not used as much as animal proteins [29]. Animal-derived proteins have a higher protein efficiency ratio (PER), biological value (BV), net protein utilization (NPU), and protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score than vegetable protein [40, 41]. Some children are allergic to foods, such as cow milk, egg, peanut, soybean products, finfish, shellfish, corn, and wheat [42]; therefore, these foodstuffs should be from their diets, and when they are removed, the allergic child might deficient in vitamin D, calcium, phosphorus, and B vitamins. Allergic children should seek the advice of a nutritionist to provide these nutrients through alternative sources [22]. At least consumption of 1.5 g/kg/d of protein and 58 kcal/kg/d can equilibrate nitrogen and energy balances in children up to 4 years [43]. The American Society for Enteral and Parenteral Nutrition (ASPEN) suggested that the protein required for pediatric is 2 to 3 g/kg/day for children less than 2 years, 1.5 to 2 g/kg/day for those aged 2 to 13 years, and 1.5 g/kg/day for those aged 13 to 18 years [44]. Foods, such as milk and formula can be used as part of liquid protein. It is not recommended to use more than 4 to 8 ounces of liquid protein; since a thicker viscosity is more useful for retching and gagging. Then meat or yogurt can be used for the rest of the required protein. Of course, all the required protein can be obtained from meat and yogurt without liquid protein (milk), but the problem is the pressure through the syringe during feeding [27]. Fat Reducing fat intake in growing children which reduces the supply of omega-6 and omega-3 essential fatty acids, has unfavorable effects on growth and leads to unfavorable lipoprotein profiles, and increases the consumption of potentially harmful trans fatty acids [45]. The purpose of added fat is to provide calories and essential fatty acids. If linoleic acid provides at least 1% of the total calories, the deficiency of essential fatty acids can be prevented, but the recommended limit is 3-4% of the total calories [46]. In a 1500 kcal diet, the least amount of linoleic acid needed is recommended to be between 1.7 and 6.7 g/d [47]. Essential fatty acids can be obtained from safflower, sunflower, soy, and corn oils, but since these fatty acids are the main sources of Omega-6 fatty acids, their additional administeraton is harmful due to pro-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects [48, 49]. Canola and olive oil are commonly used as fat sources because they have low saturated fat content (1 to 2 tablespoons) [27]. Medium-chain triglycerides can be used to provide fat due to their unique attributes (better water miscibility, faster hydrolysis, better absorption into intestinal mucosal cells, and transfer of medium-chain fatty acids into portal circulation than long-chain triglycerides) [50]. Total lipid consumption should be 3-4 g.kg-1. day-1 [51]. Carbohydrates Carbohydrates are usually tolerated except for lactose and they do not have any gastrointestinal side effects. Glucose is a fast source of energy and the only carbohydrate available in the circulation [46] . Carbohydrate sources can be obtained from fruits and vegetables. Squash, carrots, sweet potatoes, peaches, apricots are good sources of vitamin A, beta-carotene, carbohydrates, and calories. Prunes or bananas are also high in potassium and calories. Applesauce, pears, green peas, green beans, spinach sauces are also good sources of vitamin C. Cereals are also used to increase calories, carbohydrates, and fiber and as a thickener [27]. In BTFs use slowly digestible carbohydrates from legumes and whole grains, which decreases the hazard of airway inflammation compared to commercial diets [52, 53]. Low dextrose equivalent (DE) maltodextrins have longer chains of glucose molecules, are sweeter and more soluble than those with high DE and can be used in intestinal nutrition, while high DE maltodextrins increase osmolarity and diarrhea [46]. European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism(ESPEN) is recommends 15–30 g/d fiber in the diet of patients who use enteral nutrition [54]. Micronutrients Specific micronutrient deficiencies that may occur more frequently are iron, zinc, calcium, vitamin D, and B vitamins deficiency. The sources of these micronutrients are summarized in Table 6 [39]. Vitamins and minerals are found in the market in liquid and solid form to be added to BTFs. Given sodium is often low in BTFs, in the first option, salt can be used to supply sodium, but if salt is not suitable, Pedialyte, juice (original), chicken broth, pacific foods vegetable broth, Knorr chicken bouillon can be used [22]. Cutting, post-harvest water loss (especially in leafy vegetables), and cooking cause loss of nutrients. The use of microwaves causes less nutrient loss than heating methods (except steam), and minimizing the amount of water consumed seems to further decrease these losses [55]. Table 6. Sources of vitamins and minerals
Viscosity Viscosity is defined as the resistor to flow or deformation by any material as a result of molecular cohesion and is often applied to liquids as the resistor of liquids to flow due to a shearing force [56]. One of the reasons that can explain the useful efficacy of health outcomes by BTFs is the increase in viscosity. In children, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) can increase the hazard of asthma, pneumonia, and chronic cough. Studies have shown that BTFs increasing viscosity can reduce gastric reflux and gastric emptying rate [13, 20]. Hron et al. showed a reduced rate of respiratory infection in children fed BTFs compared to children fed commercial enteral feeding. They attributed these results to possible microbiome changes and reduced aspiration; since the BTF viscosity is higher than commercial enteral nutrition [13]. Hyperosmolar commercial formulas have low viscosity, which may lead to fast gastric discharging and symptoms of dumping syndrome [20]. Free water, freezing, and thawing decreased viscosity [57]. Other factors that affect the viscosity are the stirring time and the time passed for the preparation of the formula. They increase the viscosity because these thickeners can absorb water and also the viscosity of formulas with higher energy density is lower [58]. The viscosity of BTFs varies and can be used for different goals. For example, the extremely thick formulation can be used to improve gastrointestinal symptoms in children. Moreover, the specific thickness of BTFs can be used as a dysphagia protocol [59]. Weston, S., & Clarke, T. (2020) stated that the International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI) framework can be used to measure viscosity, instead of using a viscometer, which is a method requiring expensive equipment, and can be done in a hospital or at home. This is a simple method for standardizing fluid thickness for physicians and caregivers [59]. Osmolality Another parameter that should be considered in BTFs is osmolality. Various factors, including the amount of hydrolyzed nutrients in the diet, Conclusion The results showed that BTFs used for pediatric provides calorie, protein, fat, and carbohydrates and is acceptable. However, at the same time, BTFs should be prescribed under the supervision of a nutritionist, to provide sufficient amounts of nutrients. It has been approved that BTFs are a popular option for children; since they are made from natural foods, such as meat, milk, vegetables, and fruits, and are lower in sugar, and can improve gastrointestinal symptoms. This can be a good option for families who use enteral nutrition even for children at home. Most pediatric patients use BTFs as a part of their enteral intake, making it necessary that nutritionists and physicians expand their knowledge related to BTFs to appropriately care for these pediatric patients. Acknowledgments Nothing to declare Authors' contributions All the authors equally contributed to this project and article. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript. Funding source None Conflict of interest The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest in this review. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| References | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Statistics Article View: 1,152 PDF Download: 452 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||